Cressingham Gardens TRA are proposing an alternative to Lambeth’s ‘regeneration scheme’ which would see Cressingham Gardens either partially or completely demolished to enable them to build at a higher density.
In 2012, Lambeth did a survey of all its council estates (or 75 of which we know about) to a criteria: (appendix)
Cressingham Gardens’ buildings were identified as having major structural problems, and the costs of this were stated by Lambeth to account for more than Lambeth had set aside for refurbishment to meet its housing Standards (LHS).
The residents were initially consulted on options 1-5.
(1 – refurbishment; 2 – partial infill; 3 – more infill; 4 – Partial Demolition; 5 – total Demolition).
In May 2014 Lambeth pledged to build 1000 more ‘council homes’, and then conflated the need to refurbish Cressingham Gardens with their desire to build more homes. Following a poorly conducted survey (in which the majority of residents stated they wanted option 1 – refurbishment), the council proceeded to remove options 1-3 in March 2015, leaving only option 4 (partial refurbishment) and 5 (total refurbishment – on the table.
Believing that this doesn’t reflect what the residents want or what can be done, CG are proposing an alternative/ additional set of options for the residents:
6 – Green refurbishment – Sturgis are currently doing a feasibility study to assess the viability of doing a ‘green refurbishment’ of the whole of Cressingham gardens.
7 – Refurbishing the Voids – 6 flats have lain empty for over 16 years.
8 – Additional communal facilities – workshop/ office space etc.
In relation to no 7 (the Voids) ASH have been asked to propose how to renovate/ reconstruct/ propose what we can do with the Voids
The construction of these means that 4 of these flats are potentially resting on separate foundations. The last pair of flats is potentially attached to the remaining terrace, so would be difficult to demolish without affecting the remaining terrace.. The whole terrace is however potentially unstable (as can be seen by subsidence – possibly due to a river passing beneath but to be assessed by an engineer).
To try and redesign the Voids to maximize the number of new social flats as possible.
If upon investigation it appears that the foundations of the remaining terrace (remaining 6 flats) are not structurally stable, the new flats would need to be constructed to accommodate the residents of those flats, and would need to be construct in such a way as the current residents would only move once.
WHO? Cressingham gardens residents
WHAT?– to resemble Cressingham Gardens
in section – split level maisonettes
The mixture of flats (1 bed, 2 bed, 3 bed? How many?)
Shared communal facilities – i.e. gardens at front, shared elderly room, guest room (how is this managed?)
Materials – to resemble Cressingham gardens
To achieve as much ‘green area/ growing opportunities’ as possible
(wooden balconies and plants growing up balconies so even first floor flats have gardens)
Environmental considerations: –
to be constructed with as little disruption to the immediate environment as possible – (for example – prefabricated cross laminated timber)
- To maximize insulation, double glazing and acoustic separation between flats.
- Every flat to have balcony and private outdoor space with views of the park
- Every flat will be ‘dual aspect’ ie have windows on both front and back.
- To retain the Cresssingham gardens ‘community feel’ with south facing shared balconies and lots of opportunities to grow plants
- Shared south facing front garden overlooked by most flats
- Shared back garden
How Much? Cost considerations:
- How is the construction to be financed?
- Would we need to sell any off?
How long would it take?
Benefits to residents?
- Cheaper energy bills
HOW? – The surrounding area is such that construction of these buildings will be difficult to access.
GD has already done a massing proposal showing how we could accommodate a number of additional flats
existing = 12 no.1 bed flats – (12 beds)
proposed = 15 flats
(in new block) = 7 flats (2 no 1 bed, 2 no 3 bed, 3 no 2 flats) (14 beds)
to replace terrace: = 8 flats ( 3 no 3 bed maisonettes + 5 no 2 bed maisonettes) (19 beds)
= in total an additional 21 bedrooms.
Still to do – a proposal to replace the existing Voids.
Workshop 1 –
- To discuss the general ideas and possibilities of what could be built in this area as outlined above. (not too specific)
- To discover what the residents like about Cressingham Gardens and how that might be brought into the proposals
- The resident could take us on tours of the estates – their homes, and gardens.
- ASH could do a workshop showing residents how we design/ draw the existing homes, plans, sections elevations to understand the existing site.
- To illustrate proposed designs
- To illustrate the architectural possibilities of the green refurbishment
- To explore the possibilities of the communal areas